It was late at night, it was winter and it was
cold. The wind was gusting through the surrounding trees. Two individuals stood
on the roof of Kings College Chapel in Cambridge. It was war-time, so
there were worse things that they could be doing than braving the cold on a
winters night. For instance, they could be on the battle-field, dodging
bullets. They were currently acting as fire watchmen during the German
Luftwaffe bombings. There was the faint possibility that a bomb might be
launched on them, shredding them to smithereens, but that was not very likely.
Their names were John Maynard Keynes and Friederich Hayek. Whilst they were
antagonists in the intellectual realm, in the realm of human relationships they
were good friends.
Hayek looked out at the sky, as small droplets
of water fell on his glasses. What is the likelihood of a bomb falling on
us, John?
Keynes smirked. Not very likely,
Friederich.
Hayek turned around, pacing over the august
roof. You know something, John?
What?
You prefer it if we avoid discussions of
economic theory
because, although we profoundly disagree, we get on well
together. We are good friends, Hayek said, adjusting the glasses that
fell off his large nose. He scratched his thick moustache.
Keynes laughed effusively, his white teeth
gleaming below his white own white moustache. Yes, I called your work
rubbish at one point in public. As such, you could
understand why we would prefer to avoid those weighty topics. We could discuss
the weather or even better, our shared love of classical
music.
But you must admit, that we are
political animals. However much we might adore music and the arts, we are part
of a social and political environment. At this very moment, we might be blown
to smithereens by some German bombs. However much we might want to depart
towards a purely aesthetic realm, we are ultimately political creatures shaped
by our social environment, Hayek said, as he took a pipe from his bag. He
proceeded to start smoking it.
Keynes smiled fulsomely. Yes, we are
social and political animals, yet we are both political liberals. We do have
considerable differences when it comes to politics and economics, Keynes
said, as he scratched his moustache.
What could those differences be,
Hayek asked, as he smoked his pipe.
As you well know, prior to this war, the
world has been afflicted by the Great Depression. In my view, the private
sector is not always efficient. The public sector needs to step in with
monetary policies made by the central bank. Fiscal policies need to stabilise
the business cycle. We need to manage demand so as to maintain full
employment, Keynes said.
But the price system carries
information; the free market coordinates information. Central planners do not
have knowledge of what consumers want and desire the market coordinates
this information through prices. Markets are a result of spontaneous order,
they are made up of voluntary exchanges. Any interference with the spontaneous
order of the free market would disrupt its efficiency, Hayek stated.
Markets left alone do not lead to full
employment, Keynes said, as he looked up at Hayek with a whimsical
expression. Thats why state interventionism is necessary. Markets
left alone also lead to slumps, which is why the government needs to step in so
as to correct it.
Hayek smiled. Markets reach equilibrium
when left alone.
There is a direct relationship between
the level of employment and the amount of public spending in the economy. We
need to reach full employment so as to escape this dire economic situation we
have been facing recently. We need to keep interest rates low so as to manage
public investment, Keynes stated. He had now risen from the crouching
position he had been in recently. He paced around the roof of the chapel,
inhaling the cold winter air. A progressive tax system that redistributes
wealth from the richest to the poorest. As the poor have more spending power,
they consume more, which stimulates the economy. The government would create
public investment programs so as to stimulate private investment.
Hayek smiled. The Great Depression has
been the result of the misallocation of resources during previous economic
booms. Your solution would not provide a sustainable way out of unemployment.
The only way out of this malaise would be liquidation of investments and
reallocation of productive resources. We currently have a terrible crisis, but
we have to prevent this kind of crisis from happening in the first place. Booms
and busts are a result of malinvestment, which is caused by government
interference.
Keynes stopped pacing around the roof, as he
touched his bald head. We are moved by the animal spirits.
Keynes, prior to this, had been speaking quite
eloquently. All of a sudden, he had started to talk quite gnomically. The
animal spirits? Hayek chucked. Yes, I have heard that phrase of
yours before but, no, I think that economic agents behave rationally.
The essence of all this, Keynes
said, is that I think that struggling businesses need to be kept afloat
whilst you want them liquidated. I think that the market needs to steered and
directed whilst you want it left alone. Yet we have one crucial thing in
common.
What is that? Hayek asked.
We are both liberals we both
believe in individual liberty. However, although I believe in individual
freedom, I do think that this needs to be tempered by social justice and
economic efficiency. We both believe in liberal values we both agree on
the ends but we both disagree on the means of attaining these goals. I
favour interventionist solutions whilst you favour free market solutions. We
both want to save capitalism from collapsing, which it very nearly did in the
early 1930s. We both want to save capitalism from veering towards fascism and
communism, Keynes announced.
But I still think that your
interventionist measures are a grave threat to freedom. Central planning
interferes with freedom of choice, Hayek retorted.
Keynes smiled. Look, look at the stars
tonight. We are not been showered by bombs, either.
Hayek looked up at the stars and
smiled.